To implement the blocking of a select, a goroutine builds a list of
offers to communicate (pseudo-g's, aka sudog), one for each case,
queues them on the corresponding channels, and waits for another
goroutine to complete one of those cases and wake it up. Obviously it
is not OK for two other goroutines to complete multiple cases and both
wake the goroutine blocked in select. To make sure that only one
branch of the select is chosen, all the sudogs contain a pointer to a
shared (single) 'done uint32', which is atomically cas'ed by any
interested goroutines. The goroutine that wins the cas race gets to
wake up the select. A complication is that 'done uint32' is stored on
the stack of the goroutine running the select, and that stack can move
during the select due to stack growth or stack shrinking.
The relevant ordering to block and unblock in select is:
1. Lock all channels.
2. Create list of sudogs and queue sudogs on all channels.
3. Switch to system stack, mark goroutine as asleep,
unlock all channels.
4. Sleep until woken.
5. Wake up on goroutine stack.
6. Lock all channels.
7. Dequeue sudogs from all channels.
8. Free list of sudogs.
9. Unlock all channels.
There are two kinds of stack moves: stack growth and stack shrinking.
Stack growth happens while the original goroutine is running.
Stack shrinking happens asynchronously, during garbage collection.
While a channel listing a sudog is locked by select in this process,
no other goroutine can attempt to complete communication on that
channel, because that other goroutine doesn't hold the lock and can't
find the sudog. If the stack moves while all the channel locks are
held or when the sudogs are not yet or no longer queued in the
channels, no problem, because no goroutine can get to the sudogs and
therefore to selectdone. We only need to worry about the stack (and
'done uint32') moving with the sudogs queued in unlocked channels.
Stack shrinking can happen any time the goroutine is stopped.
That code already acquires all the channel locks before doing the
stack move, so it avoids this problem.
Stack growth can happen essentially any time the original goroutine is
running on its own stack (not the system stack). In the first half of
the select, all the channels are locked before any sudogs are queued,
and the channels are not unlocked until the goroutine has stopped
executing on its own stack and is asleep, so that part is OK. In the
second half of the select, the goroutine wakes up on its own goroutine
stack and immediately locks all channels. But the actual call to lock
might grow the stack, before acquiring any locks. In that case, the
stack is moving with the sudogs queued in unlocked channels. Not good.
One goroutine has already won a cas on the old stack (that goroutine
woke up the selecting goroutine, moving it out of step 4), and the
fact that done = 1 now should prevent any other goroutines from
completing any other select cases. During the stack move, however,
sudog.selectdone is moved from pointing to the old done variable on
the old stack to a new memory location on the new stack. Another
goroutine might observe the moved pointer before the new memory
location has been initialized. If the new memory word happens to be
zero, that goroutine might win a cas on the new location, thinking it
can now complete the select (again). It will then complete a second
communication (reading from or writing to the goroutine stack
incorrectly) and then attempt to wake up the selecting goroutine,
which is already awake.
The scribbling over the goroutine stack unexpectedly is already bad,
but likely to go unnoticed, at least immediately. As for the second
wakeup, there are a variety of ways it might play out.
* The goroutine might not be asleep.
That will produce a runtime crash (throw) like in #17007:
runtime: gp: gp=0xc0422dcb60, goid=2299, gp->atomicstatus=8
runtime: g: g=0xa5cfe0, goid=0, g->atomicstatus=0
fatal error: bad g->status in ready
Here, atomicstatus=8 is copystack; the second, incorrect wakeup is
observing that the selecting goroutine is in state "Gcopystack"
instead of "Gwaiting".
* The goroutine might be sleeping in a send on a nil chan.
If it wakes up, it will crash with 'fatal error: unreachable'.
* The goroutine might be sleeping in a send on a non-nil chan.
If it wakes up, it will crash with 'fatal error: chansend:
spurious wakeup'.
* The goroutine might be sleeping in a receive on a nil chan.
If it wakes up, it will crash with 'fatal error: unreachable'.
* The goroutine might be sleeping in a receive on a non-nil chan.
If it wakes up, it will silently (incorrectly!) continue as if it
received a zero value from a closed channel, leaving a sudog queued on
the channel pointing at that zero vaue on the goroutine's stack; that
space will be reused as the goroutine executes, and when some other
goroutine finally completes the receive, it will do a stray write into
the goroutine's stack memory, which may cause problems. Then it will
attempt the real wakeup of the goroutine, leading recursively to any
of the cases in this list.
* The goroutine might have been running a select in a finalizer
(I hope not!) and might now be sleeping waiting for more things to
finalize. If it wakes up, as long as it goes back to sleep quickly
(before the real GC code tries to wake it), the spurious wakeup does
no harm (but the stack was still scribbled on).
* The goroutine might be sleeping in gcParkAssist.
If it wakes up, that will let the goroutine continue executing a bit
earlier than we would have liked. Eventually the GC will attempt the
real wakeup of the goroutine, leading recursively to any of the cases
in this list.
* The goroutine cannot be sleeping in bgsweep, because the background
sweepers never use select.
* The goroutine might be sleeping in netpollblock.
If it wakes up, it will crash with 'fatal error: netpollblock:
corrupted state'.
* The goroutine might be sleeping in main as another thread crashes.
If it wakes up, it will exit(0) instead of letting the other thread
crash with a non-zero exit status.
* The goroutine cannot be sleeping in forcegchelper,
because forcegchelper never uses select.
* The goroutine might be sleeping in an empty select - select {}.
If it wakes up, it will return to the next line in the program!
* The goroutine might be sleeping in a non-empty select (again).
In this case, it will wake up spuriously, with gp.param == nil (no
reason for wakeup), but that was fortuitously overloaded for handling
wakeup due to a closing channel and the way it is handled is to rerun
the select, which (accidentally) handles the spurious wakeup
correctly:
if cas == nil {
// This can happen if we were woken up by a close().
// TODO: figure that out explicitly so we don't need this loop.
goto loop
}
Before looping, it will dequeue all the sudogs on all the channels
involved, so that no other goroutine will attempt to wake it.
Since the goroutine was blocked in select before, being blocked in
select again when the spurious wakeup arrives may be quite likely.
In this case, the spurious wakeup does no harm (but the stack was
still scribbled on).
* The goroutine might be sleeping in semacquire (mutex slow path).
If it wakes up, that is taken as a signal to try for the semaphore
again, not a signal that the semaphore is now held, but the next
iteration around the loop will queue the sudog a second time, causing
a cycle in the wakeup list for the given address. If that sudog is the
only one in the list, when it is eventually dequeued, it will
(due to the precise way the code is written) leave the sudog on the
queue inactive with the sudog broken. But the sudog will also be in
the free list, and that will eventually cause confusion.
* The goroutine might be sleeping in notifyListWait, for sync.Cond.
If it wakes up, (*Cond).Wait returns. The docs say "Unlike in other
systems, Wait cannot return unless awoken by Broadcast or Signal,"
so the spurious wakeup is incorrect behavior, but most callers do not
depend on that fact. Eventually the condition will happen, attempting
the real wakeup of the goroutine and leading recursively to any of the
cases in this list.
* The goroutine might be sleeping in timeSleep aka time.Sleep.
If it wakes up, it will continue running, leaving a timer ticking.
When that time bomb goes off, it will try to ready the goroutine
again, leading to any one of the cases in this list.
* The goroutine cannot be sleeping in timerproc,
because timerproc never uses select.
* The goroutine might be sleeping in ReadTrace.
If it wakes up, it will print 'runtime: spurious wakeup of trace
reader' and return nil. All future calls to ReadTrace will print
'runtime: ReadTrace called from multiple goroutines simultaneously'.
Eventually, when trace data is available, a true wakeup will be
attempted, leading to any one of the cases in this list.
None of these fatal errors appear in any of the trybot or dashboard
logs. The 'bad g->status in ready' that happens if the goroutine is
running (the most likely scenario anyway) has happened once on the
dashboard and eight times in trybot logs. Of the eight, five were
atomicstatus=8 during net/http tests, so almost certainly this bug.
The other three were atomicstatus=2, all near code in select,
but in a draft CL by Dmitry that was rewriting select and may or may
not have had its own bugs.
This bug has existed since Go 1.4. Until then the select code was
implemented in C, 'done uint32' was a C stack variable 'uint32 done',
and C stacks never moved. I believe it has become more common recently
because of Brad's work to run more and more tests in net/http in
parallel, which lengthens race windows.
The fix is to run step 6 on the system stack,
avoiding possibility of stack growth.
Fixes#17007 and possibly other mysterious failures.
Change-Id: I9d6575a51ac96ae9d67ec24da670426a4a45a317
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34835
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
This adds high-level descriptions of the scheduler structures, the
user and system stacks, error handling, and synchronization.
Change-Id: I1eed97c6dd4a6e3d351279e967b11c6e64898356
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34290
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
The comment describing the overall GC algorithm at the top of mgc.go
has gotten woefully out-of-date (and was possibly never
correct/complete). Update it to reflect the current workings of the
GC and the set of phases that we now divide it into.
Change-Id: I02143c0ebefe9d4cd7753349dab8045f0973bf95
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34711
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Currently, the check for legal pointers in stack copying uses
_PageSize (8K) as the minimum legal pointer. By default, Linux won't
let you map under 64K, but
1) it's less clear what other OSes allow or will allow in the future;
2) while mapping the first page is a terrible idea, mapping anywhere
above that is arguably more justifiable;
3) the compiler only assumes the first physical page (4K) is never
mapped.
Make the runtime consistent with the compiler and more robust by
changing the bad pointer check to use 4K as the minimum legal pointer.
This came out of discussions on CLs 34663 and 34719.
Change-Id: Idf721a788bd9699fb348f47bdd083cf8fa8bd3e5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34890
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
The existing implementations on AMD64 only detects AVX2 usability,
when they also contains BMI (bit-manipulation instructions).
These instructions crash the running program as 'unknown instructions'
on the architecture, e.g. i3-4000M, which supports AVX2 but not
support BMI.
This change added the detections for BMI1 and BMI2 to AMD64 runtime with
two flags as the result, `support_bmi1` and `support_bmi2`,
in runtime/runtime2.go. It also completed the condition to run AVX2 version
in packages crypto/sha1 and crypto/sha256.
Fixes#18512
Change-Id: I917bf0de365237740999de3e049d2e8f2a4385ad
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34850
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Android on ChromeOS uses a restrictive seccomp filter that blocks
sched_getaffinity, leading this code to index a slice by -errno.
Change-Id: Iec09a4f79dfbc17884e24f39bcfdad305de75b37
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34794
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
CL 33652 removed the fake auxv for Android, and replaced it with
a /proc/self/auxv fallback. When /proc/self/auxv is unreadable,
however, hardware capabilities detection won't work and the runtime
will mistakenly think that floating point hardware is unavailable.
Fix this by always assuming floating point hardware on Android.
Manually tested on a Nexus 5 running Android 6.0.1. I suspect the
android/arm builder has a readable /proc/self/auxv and therefore
does not trigger the failure mode.
Change-Id: I95c3873803f9e17333c6cb8b9ff2016723104085
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34641
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Elias Naur <elias.naur@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
On Windows, CreateThread occasionally fails with ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED.
We're not sure why this is, but the Wine source code suggests that
this can happen when there's a concurrent CreateThread and ExitProcess
in the same process.
Fix this by setting a flag right before calling ExitProcess and
halting if CreateThread fails and this flag is set.
Updates #18253 (might fix it, but we're not sure this is the issue and
can't reproduce it on demand).
Change-Id: I1945b989e73a16cf28a35bf2613ffab07577ed4e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34616
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Stop-the-world and freeze-the-world (used for unhandled panics) are
currently not safe to do at the same time. While a regular unhandled
panic can't happen concurrently with STW (if the P hasn't been
stopped, then the panic blocks the STW), a panic from a _SigThrow
signal can happen on an already-stopped P, racing with STW. When this
happens, freezetheworld sets sched.stopwait to 0x7fffffff and
stopTheWorldWithSema panics because sched.stopwait != 0.
Fix this by detecting when freeze-the-world happens before
stop-the-world has completely stopped the world and freeze the STW
operation rather than panicking.
Fixes#17442.
Change-Id: I646a7341221dd6d33ea21d818c2f7218e2cb7e20
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34611
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The runtime no longer hard-codes the offset of
reflect.methodValue.stack, so remove these obsolete comments. Also,
reflect.methodValue and runtime.reflectMethodValue must also agree
with reflect.makeFuncImpl, so update the comments on all three to
mention this.
This was pointed out by Minux on CL 31138.
Change-Id: Ic5ed1beffb65db76aca2977958da35de902e8e58
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34590
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
golang.org/issue/17594 was caused by additab being called more than once for
an itab. golang.org/cl/32131 fixed that by making the itabs local symbols,
but that in turn causes golang.org/issue/18252 because now there are now
multiple itab symbols in a process for a given (type,interface) pair and
different code paths can end up referring to different itabs which breaks
lots of reflection stuff. So this makes itabs global again and just takes
care to only call additab once for each itab.
Fixes#18252
Change-Id: I781a193e2f8dd80af145a3a971f6a25537f633ea
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34173
Run-TryBot: Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
It takes me several minutes every time I want to find where the linker
writes out the _func structures. Add some comments to make this
easier.
Change-Id: Ic75ce2786ca4b25726babe3c4fe9cd30c85c34e2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34390
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
This fixes Linux and the *BSD platforms on 386/amd64.
A few OS/arch combinations were already saving registers and/or doing
something that doesn't clearly resemble the SysV C ABI; those have
been left alone.
Fixes#18328.
Change-Id: I6398f6c71020de108fc8b26ca5946f0ba0258667
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34501
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Explicitly filter any C-only cgo functions out of pclntable,
which allows them to be duplicated with the host binary.
Updates #18190.
Change-Id: I50d8706777a6133b3e95f696bc0bc586b84faa9e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34199
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Change the openbsd runtime to use the current sys_kill and sys_thrkill
system calls.
Prior to OpenBSD 5.9 the sys_kill system call could be used with both
processes and threads. In OpenBSD 5.9 this functionality was split into
a sys_kill system call for processes (with a new syscall number) and a
sys_thrkill system call for threads. The original/legacy system call was
retained in OpenBSD 5.9 and OpenBSD 6.0, however has been removed and
will not exist in the upcoming OpenBSD 6.1 release.
Note: This change is needed to make Go work on OpenBSD 6.1 (to be
released in May 2017) and should be included in the Go 1.8 release.
This change also drops support for OpenBSD 5.8, which is already an
unsupported OpenBSD release.
Change-Id: I525ed9b57c66c0c6f438dfa32feb29c7eefc72b0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34093
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This adds a counter for the number of times the application forced a
GC by, e.g., calling runtime.GC(). This is useful for detecting
applications that are overusing/abusing runtime.GC() or
debug.FreeOSMemory().
Fixes#18217.
Change-Id: I990ab7a313c1b3b7a50a3d44535c460d7c54f47d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34067
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
When we copy the stack, we need to adjust all BPs.
We correctly adjust the ones on the stack, but we also
need to adjust the one that is in g.sched.bp.
Like CL 33754, no test as only kernel-gathered profiles will notice.
Tests will come (in 1.9) with the implementation of #16638.
The invariant should hold that every frame pointer points to
somewhere within its stack. After this CL, it is mostly true, but
something about cgo breaks it. The runtime checks are disabled
until I figure that out.
Update #16638Fixes#18174
Change-Id: I6023ee64adc80574ee3e76491d4f0fa5ede3dbdb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33895
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
For reasons that I do not know, OpenBSD does not call pthread_create
directly, but instead looks it up in libpthread.so. That means that we
can't use the code used on other systems to retry pthread_create on
EAGAIN, since that code simply calls pthread_create.
This patch copies that code to an OpenBSD-specific version.
Also, check for an EAGAIN failure in the test, as that seems to be the
underlying cause of the test failure on several systems including OpenBSD.
Fixes#18146.
Change-Id: I3bceaa1e03a7eaebc2da19c9cc146b25b59243ef
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33905
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Commit 303b69fe packed bitvectors more tightly, but missed a comment
describing their old layout. Update that comment.
Change-Id: I095ccb01f245197054252545f37b40605a550dec
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33718
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
From the garbage collector's perspective, time can move backwards in
cgocall. However, in the midst of this time warp, the pointer
arguments to cgocall can go from dead back to live. If a stack growth
happens while they're dead and then a GC happens when they become live
again, GC can crash with a bad heap pointer.
Specifically, the sequence that leads to a panic is:
1. cgocall calls entersyscall, which saves the PC and SP of its call
site in cgocall. Call this PC/SP "X". At "X" both pointer arguments
are live.
2. cgocall calls asmcgocall. Call the PC/SP of this call "Y". At "Y"
neither pointer argument is live.
3. asmcgocall calls the C code, which eventually calls back into the
Go code.
4. cgocallbackg remembers the saved PC/SP "X" in some local variables,
calls exitsyscall, and then calls cgocallbackg1.
5. The Go code causes a stack growth. This stack unwind sees PC/SP "Y"
in the cgocall frame. Since the arguments are dead at "Y", they are
not adjusted.
6. The Go code returns to cgocallbackg1, which calls reentersyscall
with the recorded saved PC/SP "X", so "X" gets stashed back into
gp.syscallpc/sp.
7. GC scans the stack. It sees there's a saved syscall PC/SP, so it
starts the traceback at PC/SP "X". At "X" the arguments are considered
live, so it scans them, but since they weren't adjusted, the pointers
are bad, so it panics.
This issue started as of commit ca4089ad, when the compiler stopped
marking arguments as live for the whole function.
Since this is a variable liveness issue, fix it by adding KeepAlive
calls that keep the arguments live across this whole time warp.
The existing issue7978 test has all of the infrastructure for testing
this except that it's currently up to chance whether a stack growth
happens in the callback (it currently only happens on the
linux-amd64-noopt builder, for example). Update this test to force a
stack growth, which causes it to fail reliably without this fix.
Fixes#17785.
Change-Id: If706963819ee7814e6705693247bcb97a6f7adb8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33710
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Android's libc doesn't provide access to auxv, so currently the Go
runtime synthesizes a fake, minimal auxv when loaded as a library on
Android. This used to be sufficient, but now we depend on auxv to
retrieve the system physical page size and panic if we can't retrieve
it.
Fix this by falling back to reading auxv from /proc/self/auxv if the
loader-provided auxv is empty and removing the synthetic auxv vectors.
Fixes#18041.
Change-Id: Ia2ec2c764a6609331494a5d359032c56cbb83482
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33652
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
The pprof code discards all heap allocations made by runtime
routines. This caused it to discard heap allocations made by functions
called by reflect.Call, as the calls are made via the functions
`runtime.call32`, `runtime.call64`, etc. Fix the profiler to retain
these heap allocations.
Fixes#18077.
Change-Id: I8962d552f1d0b70fc7e6f7b2dbae8d5bdefb0735
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33635
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
When transitioning from C code to Go code we must respect the C
calling convention. On s390x this means that r6-r13, r15 and f8-f15
must be saved and restored by functions that use them.
On s390x we were saving the wrong set of floating point registers
(f0, f2, f4 and f6) rather than f8-f15 which means that Go code
could clobber registers that C code expects to be restored. This
CL modifies the crosscall functions on s390x to save/restore the
correct floating point registers.
Fixes#18035.
Change-Id: I5cc6f552c893a4e677669c8891521bf735492e97
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33571
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Applies the fix from CL 32920 to the new test TestSampledHeapAllocProfile
introduced in CL 33422. The test should be skipped rather than fail if
there is only one executable region of memory.
Updates #17852.
Change-Id: Id8c47b1f17ead14f02a58a024c9a04ebb8ec0429
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33453
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <munday@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The expected default behavior (no explicit GOTRACEBACK setting)
is for the stack trace to start in user code, eliding unnecessary runtime
frames that led up to the actual trace printing code. The idea was that
the first line number printed was the one that crashed.
For #5832 we added code to show 'panic' frames so that if code panics
and then starts running defers and then we trace from there, the panic
frame can help explain why the code seems to have made a call not
present in the code. But that's only needed for panics between two different
call frames, not the panic at the very top of the stack trace.
Fix the fix to again elide the runtime code at the very top of the stack trace.
Simple panic:
package main
func main() {
var x []int
println(x[1])
}
Before this CL:
panic: runtime error: index out of range
goroutine 1 [running]:
panic(0x1056980, 0x1091bf0)
/Users/rsc/go/src/runtime/panic.go:531 +0x1cf
main.main()
/tmp/x.go:5 +0x5
After this CL:
panic: runtime error: index out of range
goroutine 1 [running]:
main.main()
/tmp/x.go:5 +0x5
Panic inside defer triggered by panic:
package main
func main() {
var x []int
defer func() {
println(x[1])
}()
println(x[2])
}
Before this CL:
panic: runtime error: index out of range
panic: runtime error: index out of range
goroutine 1 [running]:
panic(0x1056aa0, 0x1091bf0)
/Users/rsc/go/src/runtime/panic.go:531 +0x1cf
main.main.func1(0x0, 0x0, 0x0)
/tmp/y.go:6 +0x62
panic(0x1056aa0, 0x1091bf0)
/Users/rsc/go/src/runtime/panic.go:489 +0x2cf
main.main()
/tmp/y.go:8 +0x59
The middle panic is important: it explains why main.main ended up calling main.main.func1 on a line that looks like a call to println. The top panic is noise.
After this CL:
panic: runtime error: index out of range
panic: runtime error: index out of range
goroutine 1 [running]:
main.main.func1(0x0, 0x0, 0x0)
/tmp/y.go:6 +0x62
panic(0x1056ac0, 0x1091bf0)
/Users/rsc/go/src/runtime/panic.go:489 +0x2cf
main.main()
/tmp/y.go:8 +0x59
Fixes#17901.
Change-Id: Id6d7c76373f7a658a537a39ca32b7dc23e1e76aa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33165
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
When we raise a signal that was delivered to C code, it's possible that
the kernel will not deliver it immediately. This is especially possible
on Darwin where we use send the signal to the entire process rather than
just the current thread. Sleep for a millisecond after sending the
signal to give it a chance to be delivered before we restore the Go
signal handler. In most real cases the program is going to crash at this
point, so sleeping is kind of irrelevant anyhow.
Fixes#14809.
Change-Id: Ib2c0d2c4e240977fb4535dc1dd2bdc50d430eb85
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33300
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
